Obama Ready to Circumvent Congress – Again

December28

Presidential “Executive Action” expanding background checks on gun-buyers is imminent, according to a Dec. 10 Associated Press report.


From the article:

Breitbart News previously reported that Obama was focused on finding ways around Congress to expand background checks, and CBS News reported that Obama had a team of White House lawyers looking at the possibility of setting an arbitrary limit of allowable gun sales so that private sellers who surpass that limit would be required to run sales through a background check.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/12/10/ap-executive-action-imminent-expand-background-checks-gun-buyers/

From Breitbart News Network

October5

Obama Goes Beyond Mere Gun Control, Hints at Confiscation


From the article:

When President Obama spoke in reaction to the heinous October 1 attack on Umpqua Community College, he went beyond his usual calls for more gun control and suggested instead that America consider following the path blazed by Australia and Great Britain.

In the mid-1990s Australia and Great Britain both instituted what were virtually complete bans on firearm possession.

Comment:

Michael N Santangelo Australian Gun Law Update
Here’s a thought to warm some of your hearts….
From: Ed Chenel, A police officer in Australia

Hi Yanks, I thought you all would like to see the real
figures from Down Under.
It has now been 12 months since gun owners in Australia were forced by a new law to
surrender 640,381 personal firearms to be destroyed by our own
government, a program costing Australia taxpayers
more than $500 million dollars.
The first year results are now in:
Australia-wide, homicides are up 6.2 percent,
Australia-wide, assaults are up 9.6 percent;
Australia-wide, armed robberies are up 44 percent (yes, 44 percent)!
In the state of Victoria…..
lone, homicides with firearms are now up 300 percent.(Note that
while the law-abiding citizens turned them in, the criminals did not
and criminals still possess their guns!)
While figures over the previous 25 years showed a steady
decrease in armed robbery with firearms, this has changed drastically upward in the past 12 months, since the criminals now are guaranteed that their prey is unarmed.There has also been a dramatic increase in break-ins and assaults of the elderly, while the resident is at home.
Australian politicians are at a loss to explain how public
safety has decreased, after such monumental effort and expense was expended in ‘successfully ridding Australian society of guns….’ You won’t see this on the American evening news or hear your governor or members of the State Assembly disseminating this information.
The Australian experience speaks for itself. Guns in the
hands of honest citizens save lives and property and, yes, gun-control laws affect only the law-abiding citizens.
Take note Americans, before it’s too late!

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/10/03/obama-goes-beyond-mere-gun-control-hints-confiscation/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social

Outcome Based Nobel Prizes?

September17

Nobel Panel saw Obama Peace Prize as ‘Mistake,’ New Book Claims


From the article:

The former director of Norway’s Nobel Institute revealed this week that he regrets the committee’s decision to give the 2009 Nobel Peace award to President Obama.

Strange…Just the other day…I was thinking about all that is going on in the world and then my thoughts turned to the Nobel Peace Prize that President Obama was given.

I used to think that the Nobel Peace Prize was based on accomplishments not…wishful thinking.

Comments:

How ironic that the place where the Nobel Prize was given is now home to thousands of Islamists because of traitor 0damba’s refusal to kill ISIS.

My head is exploding with the irony.

“Forty years after the Swedish parliament unanimously decided to change
the formerly homogenous Sweden into a multicultural country, violent
crime has increased by 300% and rapes by 1,472%. Sweden is now number
two on the list of rape countries, surpassed only by Lesotho in Southern
Africa.” –Gatestone Institute

Utterly pathetic!!!

Sweden did not do the deed. Norway did, which is fully in line with expectations. The Swedish newspapers labeled the BHO award a giant belly flop.

Even if Obama had achieved everything the Committee hoped he would achieve during his presidency, it still seems completely asinine to give someone an award based on what you HOPE they WILL do, rather than what they have actually accomplished.

“[We] thought it would strengthen Obama and it didn’t have this effect”

I thought the Nobel prize was awarded for accomplishments, not for swaying governmental policy.
The Nobel prize was weakened both by Obama’s incompetence and by the political machinations of the Nobel selection committee.

All these committees, including the one that named Obama the person of the year, are run by liberal ideologues. To them, its not what you did or will do, it’s what you mean to society at the time the vote was cast.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/sep/16/nobel-panel-saw-obama-peace-prize-mistake-new-book/

Business Deal

July27

Obama Clashes with Kenyan President Over Gay Rights


From the article:

Barack Obama, the US president, has directly challenged his host Uhuru Kenyatta, the Kenyan president, on the issue of gay rights, suggesting that “bad things happen” when countries don’t accept their citizens’ right to be homosexual.

The Crux of the Issue?:

Boniface Mwangi, from the African Centre for Open Governance which is among a group of Non-Governmental Organisations Mr Obama will meet tomorrow, said Mr Kenyatta’s pledges to tackle corruption and human rights abuses in return for more US financial support were purely “politically-expedient double speak”.

“Kenya is known for its politicians promising things they never do,” he said.

Kenya is known for its politicians promising things they never do? Yeah, Kenya and every other place that has “politicians”, lol..

I had wondered if this were a “business deal” of sorts. This article confirms that.

In another article that I had posted here…it said that Kenya was 82% Christian. How can that be with so much corruption going on ? Hmm…

They (Kenyans) didn’t exactly show Obama the door for bringing up gay rights. Though the President of Kenya wasn’t pleased.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/kenya/11763054/Obama-clashes-with-Kenyan-president-over-gay-rights.html

Is Obama Punishing His Enemies?

July27

U.S. Marshals Raid Sheriff Joe’s Office


From the article:

A judge on Friday ordered the seizure of identification documents and computer hard drives from Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s office, and chastised his attorneys for failing to turn over the evidence, requested months ago in a racial-profiling case against the Arizona lawman.

The U.S. Marshals Service later raided the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office.

 Comments:

“We must punish our enemies and reward our friends.”
Barack Hussein Obama

Reality Check…?

Let’s use a little common sense here shall we? Arizona borders Mexico with an almost completely open border that the federal government refuses to do its Constitutionally MANDATED duty to secure, and the idiot leftists can’t figure out why the vast majority of illegal aliens that Joe’s deputies are arresting are Hispanic. Can someone PLEASE explain to me how someone this freaking stupid is sitting on a federal bench with a lifetime appointment? Does a judicial appointment require the checking of any form of common sense at the door? Is having common sense a disqualifier when it comes to being named a federal judge?

Let’s look at how these traffic stops work. Car is pulled over for a traffic violation (been there, done that myself. More times than I care to admit. Even a few bogus stops where the officer just wanted to see who was driving that jacked up old SUV.) Deputy walks up to car window and says “License, registration and proof of insurance please.” and normally begins to make a little small talk. When the driver’s response is “No Hablo Anglais” and fails to produce any of the required documents, the Deputy then arrests the driver for driving without the required documentation. There is now a vehicle along the side of the road with a bunch of passengers. The Deputy asks if anyone in the vehicle has a driver’s license so that someone can drive the car home, rather than having it towed and leaving the occupants stranded. Every person in the vehicle responds with “No Hablo Anglais”. Since all adult US citizens are expected to speak ENGLISH, this would indicate that they are not US citizens. I know logic is tough for leftists so I spelled it out for them. Since all foreign nationals in the US legally are REQUIRED BY LAW to maintain either their visas or their green cards with them at all times, if they are unable to produce those documents when asked, they are either here ILLEGALLY or IN VIOLATION of the terms of their entry and therefore in VIOLATION OF THE LAW. This is simple logic and common sense. If I’m pulled over for a busted headlight, I have to produce the appropriate paperwork or face arrest and I’m a blue eyed blonde white guy. How is it racial profiling to use a little common sense and enforce the laws?

Here’s a little information for those who have never been to a predominantly illegal alien neighborhood. They buy old beater cars for cash so that they don’t have to buy liability insurance only long enough to register it. They buy the insurance for 1 month so that they have an insurance card for the registration office and then cancel coverage the next month. They don’t care about their car being destroyed in an accident because it only cost them a few hundred dollars. They don’t care about anyone in their car being injured in an accident because they either have medicaid, or simply skip out on the bill. Red light running and drunk driving are almost a part of Hispanic culture. It’s all good as long as it isn’t you or your family members who were hurt or killed by a drunk illegal alien running a red light with no insurance. Been there, done that too.

http://www.wnd.com/2015/07/u-s-marshals-raid-sheriff-joes-office/

Yes, He Hates the Constitution and Doesn’t Abide By It

July20

BREAKING: Obama Announces Plans to Ban Guns for Elderly and Disabled Americans


From the article:

The President and his staff have said it time and again: their biggest disappointment was their inability to further restrict the rights of American citizens to keep and bear arms…

What I would really like to see is Obama walking the walk by getting rid of his own security detail. I think they are probably overpaid and unnecessary.
If anyone can “prove” beyond a shadow of a doubt that his life is in danger then he can keep his security detail.
Proof anyone? I want to hear where he has been threatened. I don’t think he should have it just by virtue of his position.


First, they came for the Veterans guns, and I did not speak out-
Because I was not a Veteran.
Then, they came for the Elderly’s guns, and I did not speak out-
Because I was not Elderly.
Then they came for the Disabled people’s guns, and I did not speak out-
Because I was not Disabled.
Then, they came for me–and there was no one left to speak for me.


So, who will speak for the Veterans, the Elderly and the Disabled who may be at a disadvantage physically, to fight someone. And a gun may be their only defense against a criminal? Some people say stupid things like, “Just give them (the criminal) what they want”… What if what they want is to take your life or, the life or someone you love?

Comments:

Bob (a different bob) says:

…because we must stop all those octogenarian mass shooters…

Fat Al says:

Maybe Obama will suspend the voting rights of those that “lack the mental capacity to manage their own affairs”.

I think that might be his voting base.

Jeremy S says:

Seriously. I’m sure there would be massive outcry from the ACLU and dozens of other groups if these proposals were worded identically but RE voting rights instead of firearms.

…Of course, that’s probably because they all encourage the busing in of senile seniors — no photo ID needed — so they can vote en masse for whomever the bus driver tells them to haha

David says:

being that I’m a disabled combat veteran, I find this very very scary. this guy is like a roller coaster running off the tracks! something has to be done to stop this fella and all of us have to vote in 2016 to make sure another dictator like President Obama is not elected. we all call him Osama down at the VFW. lol

mobrules says:

This is exactly why some disabled vets wont go to the VA for and help. I know quite a few that refuse to go there because of fears of asking for counseling and what they can do.

B says:

The VA has been dumping vets who come to them for financial help into the NICS system. Its been working so great that nearly a 1/4 million veterans have lost their right to own firearms. Why not implement it on that other group that relies on the government for benefits, the elderly? And once Obamacare is in full swing, they can put in bans for people on certain cold medications or undergoing treatments, instantaneously! No stupid due process to get in the way, they’ve been putting in express lines to serfdom.

Apparently Not Part of the Agenda

July16

Obama Writes Personal Letters to 46 Felons; No Contact with Kathryn Steinle’s Family


From the article:

Nearly two weeks after 32-year-old Kathryn Steinle was murdered on San Francisco’s Pier 14 by an illegal alien and convicted felon who was released from prison earlier this year, President Barack Obama has failed to contact the victim’s family or mention her in public. Yet Obama took the time to write (and release) 46 personal letters this month to felons imprisoned for non-violent drug offenses whose sentences he has commuted.

It would be interesting if someone were to follow these felons. Oh, say for the next 5- 10 years to see how they fare and if they are truly able to reform themselves. Or, if they will return to prison under new charges.

Comments:

JohnInc

Just so I’m clear on this… the president pardoned a bunch of crack dealers?  ” It’s the most commutations in a single day since at least the administration of President Lyndon Johnson.”  Its also just plain stupid. Can you think of a crime more harmful to the community than distributing drugs to it? One man had been convicted of more than 5 pounds of drugs. 

Or is this administration actually on it?

Enemy of the state.

No it is the agenda of the party.

CA is pure Dem blue.
1. In the past 3 to 4 years we have seen the passage of Prop 47 that reduces criminal penalties for various drug crimes. In reaction crimes against property have risen dramatically, and since the crimes are now misdemeanors, rehab rates have dropped considerably for those drug offenders. Now they are released to continue their habits, that they support by theft, burglary, and robbery.

2. A judge determined that CA prisons and jails were overcrowded, that having too many criminals was cruel and unusual punishment. So now Jerry Brown and Kamila Harris and the penal system they control, is operating a catch and release program. Where career criminals and those with records of violent crime are being dumped out on the streets to commit more crime. As a result the rates of violent and serious crimes has increased dramatically in the past year. Finally the numbers have caught up with Brown and Harris. Jerry Brown the First was soft on crime, and so is Jerry Brown the Second.

3. And as we have seen, Criminal Aliens are being released back into the public, to commit heinous crimes to satisfy some sort of political goals and or philosophy, due to sanctuary policy. The bologna family, Jamiel Shaw Jr, and now Kate Steinle murders are just the tip of the iceberg. For every one of them, there are a thousand other anonymous victims of sanctuary city policy.

So true blue is what Obama is doing by sending out commutations for drug offenders, if you read the list of their crimes you see most are serving significant sentences for distribution of large quantities of cocaine . Most were selling crack and or free base cocaine. The same old argument that crack dealers got larger sentences because crack was a black urban drug of choice.

So Obama was just putting his community organizer hat on, when he approved the commutations as a moment of race based politics and to appeal to the pure blue of Dem policy. Meanwhile crime rates are on the rise. Those receiving commutations will be back on the streets and will re-offend. And soft on crime policies will reap more innocent victims.

The war on drugs is an insult to the intelligence of the American people. There are mountains of evidence proving that the biggest importers of harmful, addictive, mind diminishing street drugs is the government. The drug laws that exist do not apply to the government agencies that bring these substances to our country. They are only designed to keep everyone else from this extremely lucrative business and give the establishment another reason to oppress people.

We have seen this all before during alcohol prohibition, where the government, law enforcement and organized crime were all working together and making an unbelievable amount of money in the black market. When black markets are created the crime rate goes up, taxes go up, prices go up and the police become more corrupt, all of this is inevitable. These are in fact the very consequences that any type of prohibition intends to create.

To solve these problems all that we have to do is end all prohibitions, this would cripple the black market and drastically reduce violence. This would also drastically reduce the reach of police and the state in general, which is why it is looked at as such an impossibility. Drug laws don’t do anything to prevent drug problems in our society, they only encourage violence, raise prices and criminalize half of the population.

Discovered today I can’t get boric acid. Apparently used in some form of drug production, so no one can have it. Why is it we are all treated like, not even drug users anymore, drug makers? Boric acid? Barrier to scorpions. Ant killer. Detergent booster. It’s a necessary ingredient in the solution to kill the red yeast in my dogs ears. Gentian Violet, boric acid, alcohol. Gonna stock up on the Gentian Violet before they outlaw it. Anybody else notice they get rid of what works?

Obama’s priorities are clearly with those who wish to harm us, not those who have been harmed.

He is chief among them…..

http://www.breitbart.com /big-government/2015/07/13/obama-writes-personal-letters-to-46-felons-no-contact-with-kathryn-steinles-family/

Additional Comments

July16

 Obama Writes Personal Letters to 46 Felons; No Contact with Kathryn Steinle’s Family


If this following story is true…  Why didn’t Obama pick this guy…

mibster1

Antonio Bascaró has been in prison for over 34 years with no prior criminal record for a non-violent, first-time marijuana-only offense all for helping supply a product that’s legal in a growing number of states.

He is the longest serving marijuana prisoner in the history of the United States. Today he is 80 years old.

Please grant Clemency to my father Antonio Bascaro


https://www.change.org/p/eric-h-holder-please-grant-clemency-to-my-father-antonio-bascaro?tk=ftyxA4bIlnfuAn-2LPqIc4cyoqnsvJbRUqujD9LkBlA&utm_source=petition_update&utm_medium=email

Actually, Obama belongs in prison himself. Failure to enforce federal immigration law is a violation of the oath of office. Obama has violated his oath of office on countless occasions. Federal law 18 U.S.C. 1918 provides penalties for violation of oath of office to uphold the Constitution described in 5 U.S.C. 7311 which include: (1) removal from office and; (2) imprisonment and/or a fine. IMPEACH AND IMPRISON OBAMA!!!

Because of Obama’s associations with Bill Ayers, Frank Marshall Davis, and others over the years, he would not pass a background check to be hired as a federal employee. Yet he is president. That alone says volumes.

  • The short list of Obama’s crimes:

    Violated statute on “Material Support of Terrorism” by returning top terrorists back to terrorist organizations. Article II Section 3; Dereliction of Duty Article II Section 4
    Ignored law that requires Congress be notified prior to any detainees being moved from Guantanamo. “he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed,” Article II Section 3
    Used Executive Privilege in regards to Fast & Furious gun running scandal. When Government misconduct is the concern Executive privilege is negated.
    23 Executive Orders on gun control – infringement of the 2nd Amendment
    Exposed identity and methods of operation of a Navy SEALs team – Illegal for a President to reveal classified military secrets. Article II Section 3
    2 Executive actions mandating private health information on patients be turned over to NICS – Violation of HIPPA law.
    Executive Order bypassing Congress on immigration – Article 1 Section 1, ALL Legislative power held by Congress; Article II Section 3
    Unilaterally issued new exemptions to immigration restrictions law that bars certain asylum-seekers and refugees who provided “limited material support” to t errorists. – Article 1 Section 1; Article I Section 8 Congress shall have the Power..to establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization.
    Issued directive instructing ICE to NOT enforce immigration laws in certain cases. Article 1 Section 1, ALL Legislative power held by Congress; “he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed,” Article II Section 3
    Release of convicted illegal aliens ordered in direct opposition to law-Article II Section 3
    Expanded executive action for amnesty to illegal immigrant relatives of DREAM Act beneficiaries. Article 1 Section 1, ALL Legislative power held by Congress; “he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed,” Article II Section 3
    Executive action directing DHS that almost all immigration offenses were unenforceable absent a separate criminal conviction. Article 1 Section 1, ALL Legislative power held by Congress; “he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed,” Article II Section 3
    Ignoring Law (2006 Secure Fence Act) “he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed,” Article II Section 3
    Used DOJ to ignore section 8 of the Voting Rights Act. ” he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed,” Article II Section 3
    Used DOJ to prevent Arizona and Alabama from enforcing immigration laws. – 10th Amendment
    Information memorandum telling states that they can waive the work requirement for welfare recipients, thereby altering the 1996 welfare reform law. – Article 1 Section 1, ALL Legislative power held by Congress.
    NDAA – Section 1021. Due process Rights negated. Violation of 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, and 7th Amendments.
    Executive Order 13603 NDRP – Government can seize anything
    Executive Order 13524 – Gives INTERPOL jurisdiction on American soil beyond law enforcement agencies, including the FBI.
    Executive Order 13636 Infrastructure Cybersecurity – Bypassing Congress Article 1 Section 1, ALL Legislative power held by Congress
    Attempt to tax political contributions – 1st Amendment
    DOMA Law – Obama directed DOJ to ignore the Constitution and separation of powers and not enforce the law. ” he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed,” Article II Section 3
    Dodd-Frank – Due process and separation of powers. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau writing and interpreting law. Article. I. Section. 1
    Drone strikes on American Citizens – 5th Amendment Due process Rights negated
    Bypassed Congress and gave EPA power to advance Cap-n-Trade
    Attempt for Graphic tobacco warnings (under appeal) – 1st Amendment
    Four Exec. appointments – Senate was NOT in recess (Court has ruled unconstitutional yet the appointees still remain)
    Appointing agency czars without the “advice and consent of the Senate.” Violation of Article II, Section 2
    Obama took Chairmanship of UN Security Council – Violation of Section 9.
    ACA (Obamacare) mandate – SCOTUS rewrote legislation and made it a tax because there is no Constitutional authority for Congress to force Americans to engage in commerce. SCOTUS has no authority to Legislate or lay taxes. Article I Section 1 & 8.
    Contraceptive, abortifacients mandate violation of First Ammendment
    Healthcare waivers – No president has dispensing powers
    Refuses to acknowledge state’s 10th Amendment rights to nullify Obamacare
    Going after states (AZ lawsuit) for upholding Federal law (immigration) -10th Amendment.
    Chrysler Bailout -TARP – violated creditors rights and bankruptcy law, as well as Takings and Due Process Clauses – 5th Amendment (G.W. Bush also illegally used TARP funds for bailouts)

The Independent Payment Advisory Board (appointees by the president). Any decisions by IPAB will instantly become law starting in 2014 – Separation of Powers, Article 1 Section 1.
Congress did not approve Obama’s war in Libya. Article I, Section 8, First illegal war U.S. has engaged in. Impeachable under Article II, Section 4; War Powers Act – Article II Section 3.
Obama falsely claims UN can usurp Congressional war powers.
Obama has acted outside the constitutional power given him – this in itself is unconstitutional.
Bribery of Senator Ben Nelson and Senator Mary Landrey. (Cornhusker Kickback and Louisiana Purchase) Article II, Section 4.

With the approval of Obama, the NSA and the FBI are tapping directly into the servers of 9 internet companies to gain access to emails, video/audio, photos, documents, etc. This program is code named PRISM. NSA also collecting data on all phone calls in U.S. – Violation of 4th Amendment.
Directed signing of U.N. Firearms treaty – 2nd Amendment.
The Senate/Obama immigration bill (approved by both) raises revenue – Section 7. All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives

Obama altered law – (A president has no authority to alter law) Delayed upholding the Employer Mandate Law (ACA) until 2015 – Individual Mandate will be enforced. A President does not have that authority – Article. I. Section. 1. All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States; The president “shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed” -Article II, Section 3; Equal Protection Clause -14th Amendment

Obama Has/Had? Confidence That Archuleta Is the Right Person for the Job

July9

OPM Announces More Than 21 Million Affected by Second Data Breach


From the article:

More than 21 million Social Security numbers were compromised in a breach that affected a database of sensitive information on federal employees held by the Office of Personnel Management, the agency announced Thursday.

That number is in addition to the 4.2 million Social Security numbers that were compromised in another data breach at OPM that was made public in June. Officials have privately linked both intrusions to China.

It used to be that when you did a bad job…you got fired. Now they…Archuleta and Seymour want a pat on the back for failing to protect people’s private information because after all they did find out the information had been breached. Incredible.

I have to ask…If they had one breach…how on earth did they allow another to occur?

There used to be an old saying…”that an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure”.  Apparently they never heard that one, lol.

I say let the people whose information was breached decide whether or not Ms. Archuleta and Ms. Seymour should receive their termination papers.

You think the reason that Ms. Achuleta hasn’t been asked to step down has something to do with the fact that she was the political director for President Obama’s 2012 reelection campaign? I think so. Makes sense to me.

If someone were to tell me…that the right person for the job was someone that was ineffective at doing their job…I’d think they were a sandwich short of a picnic.  Isn’t that a nice way to put it?

Maybe with the second revelation she/they? will be asked politely to resign and then given another job somewhere else that doesn’t include anything that can be breached.

http://www.nationaljournal.com/tech/hack-opm-office-personnel-management-cyber-million-20150709

Anyone Remember This?

June2

Did Obama Break His Campaign Promise to Scrap the Patriot Act?

Original Post:


From the article:

Then-Senatorial candidate Obama in 2003 branded the Patriot Act “shoddy and dangerous” and pledged to dump it. He made the pledge in response to a candidate’s survey by the National Organization for Women. Obama reneged on the pledge. But he did work to shave off some of the more blatantly outrageous constitutional abuses in the Act by imposing some civil liberties protections in the gathering and use of intelligence, on the use of torture in interrogations, and requiring at least some semblance of due process in court proceedings. But that paled in significance when Obama in a letter and with little fanfare and comment routinely let stand most of the still noxious provisions in the Act.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/earl-ofari-hutchinson/did-obama-break-his-campa_b_288112.html

Walmart and the Military?

May11

Texas Bristles at Obama’s ‘Invasion’


From the article:

President Barack Obama plans to launch a military operation this summer that will see the special forces which killed Osama bin Laden team up with Walmart to take over Texas.

Walmart and the Military are strange bedfellows aren’t they?  There have been some conspiracy theories floating around about a connection.

“Snopes” even poo pooed the idea on their site that there was any connection between Walmart and the Military.

From Snopes.com:

Walmartyrs to the Cause

http://www.snopes.com/politics/conspiracy/walmartclosures.asp

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/db150e22-f594-11e4-a018-00144feab7de.html#axzz3ZpayGpYD

The Destruction of America?

March24

The Many Costs Of Obama’s Executive Amnesty


From the article:

Seeing as the costs will come due only after President Obama has left the White House, I guess he doesn’t care how high those costs are. But the costs are horrendous, as just added up by our country’s foremost authority on such things, Robert Rector of the Heritage Foundation.

….. the lifetime costs of Social Security and Medicare benefits paid to the millions of immigrants to whom Obama is granting legal status will be about $1.3 trillion.

I have to ask…and no one saw this coming?
http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/032315-744730-obama-amnesty-will-cost-13-trillion.htm?p=full

He Read the Transcript?

March10

Obama Responds to Netanyahu’s Speech to Congress


Seriously? I have a hard time believing that Obama read the transcript and at some point didn’t see the video. He appears very upset.

Many people make light of this situation between Netanyahu and Obama. One-upmanship. It’s a bit more serious than that.

I certainly wouldn’t want to be in Obama’s shoes.